| File-This June 21, 2016, file photo shows North Carolina NAACP president, Rev. William Barber, center at podium gesturing during a news conference in Richmond, Va. A federal appeals court on Friday, July 29, 2016, blocked a North Carolina law that required voters to produce photo identification and follow other rules disproportionately affecting minorities, finding that the law was intended to make it harder for blacks to vote in the presidential battleground state. Rev. Barber, said in an interview that the ruling was a powerful victory for civil rights and for democracy | 
         RALEIGH, N.C.
        (AP) -- A federal appeals court on Friday blocked a North 
Carolina law that required voters to produce photo identification and 
follow other rules disproportionately affecting minorities, finding that
 the law was intended to make it harder for blacks to vote in the 
presidential battleground state.
The 
Virginia-based 4th Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the measures 
violated the Constitution and the federal Voting Rights Act by targeting
 black voters "with almost surgical precision." It marks the third 
ruling in less than two weeks against voter ID laws after court 
decisions regarding Texas and Wisconsin.
Friday's
 opinion from a three-judge panel states that "the legislature enacted 
one of the largest restrictions of the franchise in modern North 
Carolina history" when it rewrote voting laws in 2013.
The appeals court also dismissed arguments by Republican lawmakers that the law was aimed at preventing voter fraud.
"Although
 the new provisions target African Americans with almost surgical 
precision, they constitute inapt remedies for the problems assertedly 
justifying them and, in fact, impose cures for problems that did not 
exist," the opinion states.
Opponents of the 
law say the ruling should increase participation by black and Hispanic 
voters on Election Day in the state that also has closely contested 
races for U.S. Senate and governor. The U.S. Justice Department, state 
NAACP and League of Women Voters were among those who sued over the 
restrictions.
"This is a strong rebuke to what
 the North Carolina General Assembly did in 2013. It's a powerful 
precedent that ... federal courts will protect voting rights of voters 
of color," said Allison Riggs, who served as the League of Women Voters'
 lead lawyer.
The Rev. William Barber, 
president of the North Carolina NAACP, said the ruling was "a 
vindication of our constitutional and moral critique and challenge to 
the constitutional extremism of our government."
The
 decision was lauded by Democratic Party presidential nominee Hillary 
Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch, but decried by Republicans 
including Gov. Pat McCrory as an effort to tilt the electoral balance in
 the November elections.
North Carolina 
legislative leaders Senate leader Phil Berger and House Speaker Tim 
Moore, both Republicans, issued a statement that they would appeal the 
ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court and blasted the judges as "three 
partisan Democrats."
"We can only wonder if 
the intent is to reopen the door for voter fraud, potentially allowing 
fellow Democrat politicians ... to steal the election," they said.
All three panel members were appointed by Democratic presidents.
However,
 it's unlikely that the evenly divided and short-handed Supreme Court 
would take the case or block Friday's ruling from governing elections 
this November, said election-law experts Ned Foley of Ohio State 
University and Richard Hasen of the University of California at Irvine.
Earlier
 this month, a federal appeals court ruled that Texas' strict voter ID 
law is discriminatory and must be weakened by November. That followed a 
ruling by a federal judge in Wisconsin that residents without a photo ID
 will still be allowed to vote.
Hasen said the Obama administration took on the North Carolina and Texas cases as a bulwark against voting restrictions.
"If
 North Carolina and Texas could get away with these voting restrictions,
 it would have been a green light for other states to do so,"  he said. 
"I think this is a hugely important decision."
North
 Carolina's voting laws were rewritten in 2013 by the General Assembly 
two years after Republicans took control of both legislative chambers 
for the first time in a century. It was also shortly after a U.S. 
Supreme Court ruling changed the requirement that many Southern states 
receive federal approval before changing voting laws.
The
 voter ID mandate, which took effect in March, required people casting 
ballots in person to show one of six qualifying IDs, although voters 
facing "reasonable impediments" could fill out a form and cast a 
provisional ballot.
North Carolina legislators
 imposed the photo ID requirement, curtailed early voting and eliminated
 same-day registration and voters' ability to cast out-of-precinct 
provisional ballots in their home counties.
The
 appeals court cited data that these methods were used 
disproportionately by black voters, who also were more likely to lack a 
qualifying ID, and it blocked the contested provisions of the law.
The
 judges wrote that in the years before the North Carolina law took 
effect, registration and participation by black voters had been 
dramatically increasing.
"We recognize that 
elections have consequences, but winning an election does not empower 
anyone in any party to engage in purposeful racial discrimination," the 
panel said.
The Rev. Moses Colbert, a 
61-year-old pastor at a church in Gastonia, said the elimination of 
same-day registration ensured that he couldn't vote on Election Day 2014
 shortly after moving within North Carolina. 
He'd sought to change his 
voter registration at the Department of Motor Vehicles, but the update 
didn't get to county officials by the election.
He
 was told his name wasn't on the rolls where he'd just moved. But when 
he drove 20 miles back to the county where he was registered before, 
election workers turned him away because of the new address on his 
license.
"I was stunned. I'm only two 
generations away from slavery," said Colbert, who is black. "This is a 
privilege every American needs to be allowed to exercise."
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
